Research Associates
wpe10.jpg (8131 bytes)
Volume 9, Number 2    Our 20th Year  February, 2001

"Any plan is bad which is not susceptible to change," Italian Proverb

BRIEF RELIEF

  1. Wyoming-easement issues as to punitive damages and forfeiture.
  2. Florida- client/accountant privilege and application.
  3. Issue of malpractice against accountant appointed as expert in matrimonial matter.
  4. Motion to vacate default judgment and request to vacate expectation against bank account.
  5. Paternity matter and long-arm jurisdiction.
  6. Opposition to motion for summary judgment in Federal District Court.
  7. Appellate Division brief and appendix in motor vehicle fact case.

PUBLICATIONS OF INTEREST

Law Without Values, The Life, Work, and Legacy of Justice Holmes, by Albert W, Alschuler. A law professor attacks America’s most revered judicial saint.

"Much does he gain who learns when he loses," Italian Proverb

Who Owns Death?, Capital Punishment, the American Conscience, and the End of Executions, by Robert J. Lifton and Greg Mitchell. Two authors argue that the death penalty may be on the way out.

Police Clearances, A Poor Way to Measure the Impact of Miranda on the Police, by Floyd Feeney, Rutgers Law Journal, vol. 32, iss. 1.

How Much Freedom for Racist Speech?, Transnational Aspects of a Conflict of Human Rights, by Friedrich Kubler, Hofstra Law Review, Winter 1998, vol. 27, iss. 2.

What’s Next for Wayne Dick?, The Next Phase of the Debate Over College Hate Speech Codes, by Matthew Silversten, Ohio State Law Journal, vol. 61, iss. 3.

MATTERS OF INTEREST

Supreme Court, Constitutional Law, Criminal Law & Procedure: Washington State’s Community Protection Act of 1990 (Act), which authorizes the civil commitment of "sexually violent predators," cannot be deemed punitive "as applied" to a single individual in violation of the Double Jeopardy and Ex Post Facto Clauses. Selling v. Young, No. 99-1185, (January 17, 2001).

Criminal Procedure: Under Due Process state must prove all elements of a crime. Fiore v. White, No. 98-942.

Second Circuit Constitutional Law, Criminal Law & Procedure, Legal Malpractice: While closed-circuit televising of child’s testimony in sexual abuse and rape case did not violate petitioner’s rights under the Confrontation Clause, his trial attorney’s cumulative errors were prejudicial and amounted to constitutional ineffectiveness of counsel. Lindstadt v. Keane, No. 99-2002, (2d. Cir. January 4, 2001).

Civil Procedure: Dismissal with prejudice under Rule 41(b) for plaintiff’s silent, unobtrusive failure to prosecute following non-compliance with the district court’s order to file reply to defendant’s summary judgment motion was too harsh a remedy to impose upon pro se plaintiff. Lesane v. Hall’s Security Analyst, Inc., No. 99-9421 (2d Cir. January 4, 2001).

Attorney’s Fees, Civil Procedure, Contracts: An unambiguous general release of a party’s obligations under a contract relieves that party of an obligation to pay attorneys’ fees under such a provision in the contract. Krumme v. Westpoint-Pepperell, No. 99-9442, (2d Cir. January 11, 2001).

Criminal Law & Procedure: Police stop of suspect for violation of section New York City Admin. Code Section 19-176(b), prohibiting riding a bicycle on the sidewalk, is sufficient to support probable cause for suspect’s arrest and subsequent discovery of gun in his possession. US v. McFadden, No. 00-1254, (2d Cir. January 18, 2001).

Washington Supreme Court: Contract Law: Insurance: An insurer acted in bad faith when it hired an expert to aid in an insured’s liability representation, then retained that expert to aid in its defense of the insured’s underinsured motorist (UM) claim. Ellwein v. Hartford Accident and Indemnity Company, No. 68230-5.

Minnesota Supreme Court: Court found that a broken window did not give the officers an objective basis upon which to believe that the vehicle was stolen. The existence of possible innocent explanation negates probable cause. State v. Britton, #C9-98-968, (January 13, 2000).

New York Trial Court: Contracts: Plaintiff contended that he and defendant entered into a legally enforceable agreement. Defendant argued that the parties had an agreement to agree. The court noted that the issue was whether three writings and the parties’ conduct considered together satisfied the statute of frauds. After reviewing the case, the court concluded all the parties had was an agreement to agree in the future. Strain v. Strain, Supreme Court, Dutchess County.

Family Law: The panel ruled that it was an error for the lower court to dismiss petitioner’s application for a modification without conducting a hearing to ascertain the amount of respondent’s income and determine what percentage of the income would be payable as additional child support. The level of support was negotiated by the parties, but the respondent’s income had allegedly increased. Burnett v. Student, App. Div.

Sleeping Lawyer Case under review: Burdine was convicted and sentenced to death while his lawyer dozed off repeatedly in the courtroom. The lawyer’s naps did not violate Burdine’s rights in the 1984 case, three federal appeals court judges ruled in October. But now all 14 judges on the 5th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals are to hear arguments by Burdine’s new lawyers and the Texas attorney general’s office on whether that ruling should be overturned.